The Annual Audit 2026

Annual Audit 2026 - cover

Women’s Aid Annual Audit 2026The 2026 edition of Women’s Aid annual publication provides an in-depth picture of the provision, usage and work of domestic abuse services in England during the 2024-25 financial year. The report provides a unique insight into how the domestic abuse sector continues to grow, develop, and adapt, whilst demonstrating the areas that need to improve. Overall, the evidence demonstrates how specialist domestic abuse services are a life-saving and essential infrastructure, and the national response to violence against women and girls cannot be delivered without a robust and sustainable specialist sector. 

© Women’s Aid, March 2026  

Please cite this report as: 
Women’s Aid. (2026) The Annual Audit 2026, Bristol: Women’s Aid. 

Key findings 

Demand 

  • Based on ONS prevalence data, only around 7.0% of women and children who experienced domestic abuse during this period were supported by a refuge or CBS service.
  • The most common reason for rejected refuge referrals was lack of capacity or space (42.7% of all rejected referrals).  Available evidence suggests this may be linked to increased length of stay in refuge due to delays in accessing appropriate move-on accommodation.

Provision 

  • On 1st May 2025 there were 4,619 bedspaces across 286 refuges, an increase of 68 bedspaces since the previous year. Despite this small increase, there is still a substantial shortfall of 19.9% of the Council of Europe’s recommendation of one refuge bedspace per 10,000 head of population.
  • 7,853 vacancies were posted on Routes to Support in 2024-25. This is an increase of 303 compared to the previous year, however it is still significantly lower than pre-pandemic levels.
  • Only 11.5% of vacancies could consider a woman with no recourse to public funds in 2024-25. Vacancies suitable for wheelchair users are incredibly scarce at only 1.1% of vacancies.
  • The proportion of refuges running a dedicated children and young people (CYP) service decreased by 11.6%, so only 58.0% of refuge services and 52.2% of CBS services had a dedicated CYP service as of 1st May 2025.  

Funding 

  • At least one in eight (13.3%) refuge services receive no local authority commissioned funding at all. 
  • Of those that do receive funding through local authority commissioning, only around a third (36.0%) are funded for all support staff costs, including salaries, clinical supervision and training. 
  • Refuges run by and for Black and minoritised women were less likely to be commissioned by the local authority, with 42.9% of Imkaan-member refuges being fully commissioned compared to the national proportion of 72.4% of all refuges being fully commissioned. 
  • Almost two fifths (39.1%) of organisations delivered part of their domestic abuse service without dedicated funding in 2024–25, an increase from 35.0% the previous year. Of organisations delivering unfunded services: 42.0% relied on volunteers; 22.0% closed or reduced part of their service during the 2024-25 financial year; and 30.0% reported reduced capacity to support women with more complex needs. 

Collaboration and Accountability

  • Just under a third (32.0%) indicated that there had been positive improvements in their local area, however, the same proportion (32.0%) reported that multi-agency working had been mixed, with some positive improvements as well as some negative impact/ deterioration.
  • Three fifths (61.7%) of organisations were represented on their Local Partnership Board (LPB) in 2024–25. Of those: just over half (54.4%) agreed their LPB had delivered effective decision-making locally; less than half (44.3%) agreed LPBs had improved conditions for survivors; and less than a third (31.6%) agreed LPBs had improved commissioning for specialist services.
  • Less than a third (29.7%) of organisations felt they were able to effectively hold their local authority to account for decision-making, and only 11.7% of organisations felt that accountability mechanisms in their local area were ‘very effective.’   
  •  

Emerging trends and issues 

  • Almost a third (32.2%) of services reported that they had a written AI policy or were in the process of developing one.
  • The majority of services (64.9%) either agreed (47.7%) or strongly agreed (17.2%) that they were able to sufficiently safety plan around technology-facilitated abuse. However, they are restricted by how these technical devices operate.
  • The most common form of technology-facilitated abuse identified as new to services’ experience in the past year was coerced participation in OnlyFans or other online activity.
  • Services reported the following impacts of the far-right riots in Summer 2024: Increased demand on services; Increased discrimination and direct racist abuse experienced by survivors; Two services reported having to close offices or cancel face-to-face provision during this period; Services expressed concern about longer-term impacts on survivors’ willingness to seek help .
  • Services reported increased need to support women affected by humanitarian crises, particularly migrant survivors, alongside a greater emotional and practical burden on frontline staff responding to trauma outside their usual remit.  
Scroll to Top